Legal Opinion

Loud v. Luse

California Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1931No. Docket No. L.A. 11295PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Defendants appeal on the judgment-roll from a judgment decreeing the cancellation of a deed by which plaintiff conveyed real property in the city of Glendale, county of Los Angeles, to defendant A. F. Luse in reliance on the fraudulent promise of said defendant to cause to be conveyed to her in exchange therefor valuable oil lands in the state of Texas. The judgment also directed defendant Luse to restore to plaintiff the sum of $2,500 paid by her to consummate the transaction, and to deliver up for cancellation a promissory note executed by plaintiff in favor of defendant in the sum of $500,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Henry v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Hammond Lumber Co. v. Barth Investment Corp.California Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Campbell v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Raynor v. MintzerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mark Hopkins, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Garrison v. Edward Brown & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Hicks v. HicksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Fleming v. KaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Cox v. KlatteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API