Legal Opinion

Cox v. Klatte

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1938No. Civ. 2181PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

The factual background, fairly characterized from the disputatious versions of the evidence as depicted in the transcript and briefs filed in the above-entitled action, discloses that Franeina E. Biel, as grantee, during the year 1920, received as her separate property certain real property in the city of Redlands, of the probable value of $6,000. In the year 1929, Henry Biel, her husband, died, leaving as his heirs his widow and his two sisters, one of the latter being Miss Clara M. Biel, intervener and appellant, hereinafter referred to as “intervener”. Subsequent to the death of her…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Sheehan v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Lawrence v. GayettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Mahoney v. BostwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Dunphy v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Butler v. NeppleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Church of the Merciful Saviour v. Volunteers of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Longway v. NewberyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Adams v. TalbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API