Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Kagan

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1961No. Civ. 24502PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Plaintiffs brought this suit against I. E. Benveniste, United States Wrecking Corporation, Myles Kagan, and Hyman Galea for a decree cancelling (1) a promis sory note and a deed of trust securing the note, (2) a purported contract of sale of an unfinished building, and for compensatory and punitive damages. "United States Wrecking Corporation, Myles Kagan, and Hyman Galea did not appear at the trial. I. E. Benveniste appeared with counsel. Judgment was for plaintiffs as prayed except that no damages were awarded against Benveniste. Benveniste appeals.

Plaintiffs owned a parcel of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. People v. BarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. CIT Corporation v. PanacCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Estate of KemmerrerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Lamb Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Flores v. EMC Mortgage Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
  2. Hamilton v. Bank of Blue ValleyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  3. Herrejon v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
  4. Forester v. StewardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  5. Star Pacific Investments, Inc. v. Oro Hills Ranch, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API