Legal Opinion

Henry v. Phillips

California Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1912No. S.F. No. 5794PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The defendants appeal from the judgment. The evidence is presented in a bill of exceptions.

1. The objection that the court erred in allowing the amended complaint to be filed is not well taken. The claim is made that it states a cause of action different from that set up in the original complaint. The first complaint states a cause of action, in the usual general form, to quiet plaintiff’s title to a tract of land. The amended complaint sets forth the plaintiff’s title in substantially the same language as in the first complaint, but it further alleges that the defendants’ alleged unfounded…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. More v. MoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Tedford v. Los Angeles Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Webb v. BaileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Lewis v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Rhodes v. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Glenn v. RiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Lee v. MacOn County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Aalwyn v. CobeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Fleming v. KaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API