Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Kennedy

California Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1918No. Sac. No. 2444PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

In August, 1900, the plaintiffs, who were the owners of certain mining property in the county of Butte, gave to one Steifer a working bond or option, entitling him to work the property, and to receive a conveyance upon payment of nineteen thousand dollars. Except for a relatively small amount, the entire purchase price was to be paid out of the net proceeds of the mining operations to be conducted. Steifer ’s rights under the agreement passed to a corporation which he organized for that purpose. This corporation operated the mine, but nothing was ever paid to the plaintiffs from the net…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richter v. Union Land & Stock Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Sterling v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ephraim v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Sherman v. IngelmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Loud v. LuseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Lasher v. FawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Morse v. CustisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API