Legal Opinion
Nielsen v. Richards
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 7, 1924No. Civ. No. 2783PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
The trial court sustained the respondent’s demurrer to the petition herein and entered judgment denying the petition. At the hearing on the demurrer the parties filed an agreed statement of facts and stipulated that the court might consider the same “for the purpose of deciding the above entitled matter. ’ ’ The following facts appear in such agreed statement:
C. H. Nielsen is “the duly appointed, qualified and acting county superintendent of schools of the County of Butte” and respondent is the county auditor thereof. August 31, 1923, C. H. Nielsen, as such county superintendent, and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kennedy v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Tarpey v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Inglin v. HoppinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Gay v. TorranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- In re FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Main v. Claremont Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Nielsen v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Younger v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Yreka Union High School District v. Siskiyou Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Curley v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.