Legal Opinion
Nielsen v. Richards
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 21, 1925No. Docket No. 3000PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
Action by petitioner to secure' a writ of mandate directing the respondent, as the Auditor of the County of Butte, to audit, approve, and allow a certain warrant issued and delivered to petitioner by C. H. Nielsen, the county superintendent of the county of Butte, for and on account of a certain contract purporting to employ the petitioner as a supervising teacher of rural schools in the county of Butte. Respondent had judgment and the petitioner appeals.
The record shows that during all the times referred to in this proceeding C. H. Nielsen was the superintendent of schools of the county of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Berka v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Stockton Plumbing & Supply Co. v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Tyler v. SanbornIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Dundas's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
- Shebley v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Frazier v. State by and Through PittmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Miller v. City of MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- City of Oakland v. California Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
- County of Shasta v. MoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Pacific Finance Corp. v. City of LynwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.