Legal Opinion
Rabago v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 23, 1978No. Civ. 3524PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN (G. A.), P. J.
Appellant, Genaro Rabago, sought a writ of administrative mandamus (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) directing the State Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (hereinafter Board) to set aside its decision denying him unemployment benefits. His claim had been denied by the Employment Development Department, the administrative law judge (ALJ) and the Board. After a trial on December 21, 1976, the court below entered findings of fact and conclusions of law and a judgment denying the writ. Appellant contends that as a matter of law he was not the moving party in the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Yakov v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Gibson v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Lacy v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- California Employment Commission v. Butte County Rice Growers Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Interstate Brands v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Burke v. Board of ReviewAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Amador v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Davis v. Board of Review of the Department of LaborAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Wright v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.