Legal Opinion
Lacy v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 4, 1971No. Civ. 12768PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRIEDMAN, J.
The Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board sustained the decision of a referee who held that petitioner Mary E. Lacy was disqualified for unemployment insurance benefits because she had been discharged from her last employment for misconduct. Section 1256, Unemployment Insurance Code, disqualifies an individual who has been discharged for misconduct connected with his most recent work. 1 Mrs. Lacy brought a mandate proceeding in the superior court. That court reviewed the transcript of testimony at the hearing and ordered the board to vacate its decision and award benefits.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- California Department of Human Resources Development v. JavaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Moran v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Yakov v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Interstate Brands v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Aries Development Co. v. California Coastal Zone Conservation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Jacobs v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Talmo v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Amador v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.