Legal Opinion

Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 22, 1945No. Appeal, 152PublishedCited by 223 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

This is an appeal by the employer from the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review. The bureau determined that the claimant was eligible for compensation. Upon the employer’s appeal, the referee reversed the bureau and denied benefits. The board, on its own motion, reviewed the referee’s decision, reversed it, and allowed the claim.

The board’s findings of fact are supported by the evidence, and are binding upon us. Unemployment Compensation Law of December 5, 1936, P. L. (1937) 2897, §510, 43 PS §830. They will be stated compen-diously.

Mabel Sturdevant was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. MacFarland v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Teicher Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

3Cited by223 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Warner Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Deiss v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Penn Hills School District v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Krauss v. A. & M. KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953

218 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API