Gibson v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
When a claims interviewer denied plaintiff’s (hereinafter petitioner) application for unemployment benefits, petitioner asked an attorney to appeal that decision to a referee. Due to a mistake in calendaring, the attorney filed the appeal three days after the expiration of the ten-day period provided by Unemployment Insurance Code section 1328. Although both section 1328 and Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board rule 5028 permit extension of the 10-day period for “good cause,” 1 the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board has developed' a narrow and rigid rule that no error of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- California Department of Human Resources Development v. JavaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Thomas v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Henry G. Mack v. South Bay Beer Distributors, Inc., Dba Bay Beer Distributors, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Cumero v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. DeFranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Gilles v. Department of Human Resources DevelopmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.