Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1973No. Sac. 7970PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

When a claims interviewer denied plaintiff’s (hereinafter petitioner) application for unemployment benefits, petitioner asked an attorney to appeal that decision to a referee. Due to a mistake in calendaring, the attorney filed the appeal three days after the expiration of the ten-day period provided by Unemployment Insurance Code section 1328. Although both section 1328 and Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board rule 5028 permit extension of the 10-day period for “good cause,” 1 the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board has developed' a narrow and rigid rule that no error of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. California Department of Human Resources Development v. JavaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Thomas v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Henry G. Mack v. South Bay Beer Distributors, Inc., Dba Bay Beer Distributors, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Cumero v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. People v. DeFranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Gilles v. Department of Human Resources DevelopmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API