Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. May

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 24, 1959No. 12,426PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Homer FeRguson, Judge:

The accused, upon his plea of giiilty, was convicted by general court-martial of larceny, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 921, and was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge and total forfeitures. The convening- authority approved only so much of the sentence as provided for a bad-conduct discharge and forfeiture of $50.00 per month for six months. He ordered the sentence executed, suspending the execution of the punitive discharge “until completion of appellate review.” No provision for automatic remission was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. United States v. EggersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  3. United States v. RobertsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  4. United States v. GreenwaltUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  5. United States v. RosatoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. BinghamUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  2. United States v. DawsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  3. Moore v. AkinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  4. United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  5. United States v. RascoeU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API