Legal Opinion

United States v. Eggers

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 7, 1953No. 1990PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Paul W. BROSman, Judge:

The accused, Eggers, was convicted under four specifications alleging the utterance of a forged writing, and four specifications alleging forgery.1 After approval of the findings and sentence by the convening authority the case was considered by a board of review. That body reached the conclusion that two specimens of handwriting, procured from accused before trial, and introduced in evidence over his objection, violated the privilege against self incrimination secured to accused persons under Article 31(a) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.2…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Motes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. People v. . GardnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1894

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. United States v. RinehartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  2. United States v. VoorheesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. ArmstrongUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  4. United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. United States v. NicholsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API