United States v. Eggers
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Paul W. BROSman, Judge:
The accused, Eggers, was convicted under four specifications alleging the utterance of a forged writing, and four specifications alleging forgery.1 After approval of the findings and sentence by the convening authority the case was considered by a board of review. That body reached the conclusion that two specimens of handwriting, procured from accused before trial, and introduced in evidence over his objection, violated the privilege against self incrimination secured to accused persons under Article 31(a) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.2…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Motes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- People v. . GardnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- United States v. RinehartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. VoorheesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. ArmstrongUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. NicholsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.