Legal Opinion

United States v. Dawson

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 12, 1981No. 38,445; CM 438463PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLETCHER, Judge:

This case requires us to examine a certain plea-bargaining practice in the armed services.

On April 27, 1979, Brigadier General Healy, an acting general court-martial convening authority, referred to a general court-martial various charges and specifications against the appellant. Shortly thereafter, on April 30, 1979, the appellant, with advice of counsel, entered into a pretrial agreement with General Healy. In return for the appellant’s pleas of guilty, this acting general court-martial convening authority promised to approve a sentence no greater than a dishonorable…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Cooke v. OrserUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. KazenaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  3. United States v. KoopmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  4. Aviz v. CarverU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
  5. United States v. CassityU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API