Great Lakes Press Corp. v. Froom
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
TELESCA, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed this action seeking a declaratory judgment that it is not infringing United States Patent No. 4,555,027 (“ ’027”) or Patent No. 4,699,614 (“ ’614”) and that said patents are invalid because, inter alia, they were obvious, 35 U.S.C. Section 103, defendant was not the sole inventor, 35 U.S.C. Section 116, and defendant failed to make the required disclosures, 35 U.S.C. Section 112. Plaintiff also asserts three state law causes of action; seeking a declaration of shop rights, for unfair competition based on the defendants’ refusal to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Miller v. . SchlossNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- University Patents, Inc. v. KligmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Holcomb Health Care Services, LLC v. Quart Limited, LLC (In Re Holcomb Health Care Services, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2004
- Access Cardiosystems, Inc. v. Fincke (In Re Acces Cardiosystems, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- Lacy v. Rotating Productions Systems, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- Gasser v. Infanti International, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.