Legal Opinion

Lacy v. Rotating Productions Systems, Inc.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1998No. 97CA0076PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge KAPELKE.

Defendants, Rotating Production Systems, Inc., (RPS) and John Larry Land, appeal the judgment entered by the trial court rescinding the patent assignment made by plaintiff, Rodger Lacy, to RPS. Land also appeals the judgment in favor of Lacy on Land’s counterclaim against him for breach of an alleged loan agreement. We reverse the judgment allowing rescission and affirm the judgment on the counterclaim.

In May 1991, RPS was incorporated to exploit the potential of inventions designed to rotate oil well tubing under tension. A reliable system for rotating well tubing…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jet Courier Service, Inc. v. MuleiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. Julius Hyman & Co. v. Velsicol Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  3. Davis v. Alwac International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  4. Michaelson v. MichaelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. Kincaid v. Western Operating Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lackner v. GlosserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Black v. Southwestern Water Conservation DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Morris v. Belfor USA Group, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Command Communications, Inc. v. Fritz CompaniesColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Campbell v. Summit Plaza AssociatesColorado Court of Appeals · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API