Legal Opinion

Greenberg v. Western Turf Assn.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1903No. S.F. No. 2665PublishedCited by 55 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. D. E. Alexander, C. F. Gardner, and W. S. Goodfellow, for Appellant. The court erred in permitting the defendant to prove any other acts of exclusion from the race-track not alleged in the complaint. No special damages are alleged, and only the proximate actual damage for the act complained of can be recovered.

Read the full summary

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. D. E. Alexander, C. F. Gardner, and W. S. Goodfellow, for Appellant. The court erred in permitting the defendant to prove any other acts of exclusion from the race-track not alleged in the complaint. No special damages are alleged, and only the proximate actual damage for the act complained of can be recovered. (Treadwell v. Whittier, 80 Cal. 579;1 Stevenson v. Smith, 28 Cal. 103;2 Potter v. Froment, 47 Cal. 165; Chitty’s Pleadings, 16th Am. ed. 348; 2 Greenleaf on Evidence, sec. 254.) Remote and speculative injury to the plaintiff’s business…

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Defendant was the proprietor of a race-track known as the Tanforan Race-track, and was giving races to which the public was admitted. Plaintiff pleads that on the fifth day of December, 1899, he purchased a ticket of admission to the race-track, presented it to defendant, demanded admission, and his demand was refused. He pleads that he is, and was “on and prior to said 5th day of Decem her, A. D. 1899, engaged in the business of printing and publishing a publication entitled ‘Daily Racing Form,’ which is, and was, a paper devoted to giving to the general public information and news…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. People v. . KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Barkly v. CopelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Donnell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Brown v. EvansUnited States Circuit Court · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Marina Point, Ltd. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Commodore Home Systems, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In Re CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Walnut Creek Manor v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. In Re Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Wage & Hour LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API