Legal Opinion

Stearns v. Fair Employment Practice Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1971No. L. A. 29891PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

When Ernest Cooper, a Negro, sought to rent an apartment from Val Stearns, Stearns required Cooper to complete a credit application and submit to a credit investigation before the apartment could be rented. Three hours after Steams dealt with Cooper, a Caucasian sought the same apartment. Stearns solicited an immediate deposit but required no credit check, offering the Caucasian occupancy as soon as the apartment could be cleaned. On the basis of these facts, the Fair Employment Practice Commission (FEPC) found that Stearns discriminated against Cooper on the grounds of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Burks v. Poppy Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Hayes v. Richfield Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Eatwell v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Walnut Creek Manor v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Peralta Community College District v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Achal v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  5. McHugh v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API