United States v. Saccoccia
District Court, D. Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
Decision
TORRES, Chief Judge.
The United States (the government) has moved to compel several attorneys to turn over money and other property received as attorneys’ fees from Stephen and Donna Saccoccia who were convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), the RICO conspiracy statute.
For the reasons hereinafter stated, that motion is granted, in part, and denied, in part.
Background
On November 19, 1991, Stephen Saccoc-cia (Stephen), Donna Saccoccia (Donna) and others were indicted for a variety of offenses stemming from their alleged laundering of nearly $140 million derived from drug trafficking.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. MonsantoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. SaccocciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Ven-Fuel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. SaccocciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Saccoccia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Stephen A. Saccoccia, United States of America v. Stephen A. Saccoccia, United States of America v. Stephen A. SaccocciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- United States v. SaccocciaDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.