Legal Opinion

Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 22, 1989No. 87-1729PublishedCited by 748 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

We are called on to determine whether the federal drug forfeiture statute includes an exemption for assets that a defendant wishes to use to pay an attorney who conducted his defense in the criminal case where forfeiture was sought. Because we determine that no such exemption exists, we must decide whether that statute, so interpreted, is consistent with the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. We hold that it is.

I

In January 1985, Christopher Reckmeyer was charged in a multicount indictment with running a massive drug importation and distribution scheme. The scheme was alleged to be a continuing…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by748 opinions

  1. Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Kowalski v. TesmerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Members of the New York State Crime Victims BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Kaley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

743 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API