Legal Opinion

United States v. Saccoccia

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided October 25, 2004No. C.R. 91-115-TPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TORRES, Chief Judge.

Introduction

The United States (the government) has moved to compel the disgorgement of attorneys’ fees paid to attorneys for Stephen Saccoccia on the ground that payment of the fees was an act of civil contempt because it violated a Protective Order prohibiting Saccoccia from transferring $144 million that Saccoccia was accused of obtaining by laundering the proceeds of illegal drug sales. The questions presented are whether the government’s motion is barred by the doctrine of laches; and, if not, whether the government has proven, by clear and…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Colorado v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Nicholas M. Patton v. Richard Bearden, Robert Bearden, and J.M. Bearden, Individually, and D/B/A Bearden Fish FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. SaccocciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  2. James A. Pousson v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API