Legal Opinion

Ruberoid Co. v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1963No. L. A. 26914PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

We face the question in this case whether the statutory provision as to “a trade dispute” bars the collection of unemployment insurance by a striking employee whom the employer has discharged and permanently replaced. We hold that since the permanent replacement at once prevents any choice or volition on the part of the worker to return to the job and since it severs the trade dispute as the cause of the unemployment, the disqualification of the section no longer operates. We set forth hereafter in more detail the basis for this conclusion.

Defendants appeal from a judgment vacating certain…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Bunny's Waffle Shop, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Matson Terminals, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Mark Hopkins, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Thomas v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development Commission v. Town of EmeryvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Inc. v. Department of Employment & TrainingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Isobe v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Federico v. Brannan Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. Windigo Mills v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1979

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API