Legal Opinion
Cameron E. Berry v. Gerson Hollander, Ted Galey, Perry Norman, W. Paul Nichol, and A.B. Carr
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 1, 1991No. 88-4031PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
Cameron E. Berry was a pathologist employed by the Veterans Administration (“VA”). He alleges defendants conspired to violate his First and Fifth Amendment rights by (1) suspending his clinical privileges, (2) conducting a clandestine “peer review” of his pathology reports, and (3) driving Berry from his job. The district court granted summary judgment for defendants, finding Berry’s claims were precluded because he had available remedies under the statutory scheme which covers VA employees in the Department of Medicine and Surgery (“DMS”). We affirm.
I
Berry was hired by…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Schweiker v. ChilickySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Adams v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Janicki Logging Co. v. Bruce Mateer Dale RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Iqbal M. Khan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Mirmehdi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Western Radio Services Co. v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.