Legal Opinion

Adams v. Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 22, 2004No. 02-35509PublishedCited by 401 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOULD, Circuit Judge:

Partners in cattle partnerships organized and managed by breeder Walter J. Hoyt, III (the “Hoyt partnerships”) brought suit against Hoyt and more than twenty Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) agents (the “federal defendants”) in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon asserting claims for money damages under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). Plaintiffs alleged that the IRS’s audits of the partnerships and the IRS’s assessment and collection of partnership taxes…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Schweiker v. ChilickySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. William H. And Avilda L. Edwards v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by401 opinions

  1. Doe I v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. John Benavidez v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  3. Fayer v. VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Eva Hall v. North American Van Lines, Inc. George Correa All City Moving and StorageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. In re Yahoo Mail LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014

396 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API