Legal Opinion
Mirmehdi v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 3, 2011No. 09-55846PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge O’SCANNLAIN; Concurrence by Judge SILVERMAN.
ORDER
The opinion filed in this case on November 3, 2011, and reported at 662 F.3d 1073, is hereby amended. An amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order. With this amendment, the panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judges O’Scannlain and Silverman have voted to deny the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and Judge Alarcón has so recommended. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc.…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Roger Vanderklok v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Daniel Engel v. Robert BuchanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Ignacio Lanuza v. Jonathan LoveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Faour Fraihat v. US Imm. & Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Turkmen v. HastyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.