Legal Opinion

Janicki Logging Co. v. Bruce Mateer Dale Robertson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 13, 1994No. 93-35871PublishedCited by 171 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge:

Janicki Logging Company, Inc. appeals from the district court’s dismissal of its action against two officials of the United States Forest Service, Bruce Mateer and Dale Robertson. Janicki sued them in their individual, not official, capacities. It claimed that its constitutional rights were violated when a portion of its logging contract with the USFS was cancelled after the discovery of a Northern Spotted Owl’s nest in the affected area. Janicki also claims that the district court erred when it failed to allow an amendment of the complaint and a transfer of the case…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Schweiker v. ChilickySupreme Court of the United States · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by171 opinions

  1. W. Michael Kimes J. Colette Boykin v. Peter G. Stone, Judge, Superior Court Robert L. Mezzetti, II Henry Mariani Robert MacHadoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Romano v. BibleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Britell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  4. Kwai Fun Wong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Western Radio Services Co. v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API