Sherman v. Panno
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff, Pearl Sherman, from an order granting defendants’ motion for a new trial upon the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence. The defendants, Vivian Panno and Carlo Panno, husband and wife, have cross-appealed from the whole and each and every part of the judgment.
The action is one by Pearl Sherman and her husband, Marty Sherman, to have the court declare and enforce a resulting trust over a parcel of farm land in the Imperial Valley of California. At the conclusion of the trial, the judge announced that judgment would be for the plaintiff, Pearl Sherman.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Reynolds v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- McCordic v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Kahn v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Forslund v. ForslundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. BouchardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Meskell v. Culver City Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Gordon v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.