McCordic v. Crawford
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
Venice Pier is leased from the city of Venice by defendant Abbot-Kinney Company and is maintained and repaired by the latter. The carnival attractions on the pier are operated by concessionaires under contract with Abbot-Kinney Company. Defendant Samuel Crawford was authorized to operate a “Loopa” on the pier, under an oral agreement that the company receive 25 per cent of the gross receipts. The Loopa was somewhat like an old-fashioned swing, with a board suspended by steel rods from an axle some fifteen or twenty feet above the ground. It was so constructed that riders standing on the board…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wodnik v. Luna Park Amusement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Johnstone v. Panama Pacific International Exposition Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Harvey v. MacHtigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Kahn v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Kraft v. LamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Snyder v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Palmer v. GTE California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Knell v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Love v. WolfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Kahn v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.