Cabrera v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Per curiam
In this appeal, we consider the adequacy of jury instructions about the reliability of accomplice testimony. Under settled Delaware law, trial courts have wide latitude in framing jury instructions, and their choice of wording will not be disturbed as long as the instruction correctly states the law and is not so confusing or inaccurate as to undermine the jury’s ability to reach a verdict. The Superior Court did not use the pattern jury instruction or the language suggested by either attorney, but it gave an instruction that was informative and not misleading. Accordingly, we affirm.
I.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Storey v. CastnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
- Baker v. ReidSupreme Court of Delaware · 1947
- Bland v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
3Cited by45 opinions
- Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- Ortiz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Hoskins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Chrysler Corp. v. Chaplake Holdings, Ltd.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2003
- Saudi Basic Industries Corp. v. Mobil Yanbu Petrochemical Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.