Legal Opinion

Saudi Basic Industries Corp. v. Mobil Yanbu Petrochemical Co.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 14, 2005No. 493,2003PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Justice.

Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (“SABIC”), the counterclaim defendant below, appeals from a $416.8 million Superior Court judgment entered against SABIC and in favor of SABIC’s joint venture partners, Mobil Yanbu Petroleum Company (“Mobil”) and Exxon Chemical Arabia, Inc. (“Exxon”). 2 SABIC brought this action in the Superior Court of Delaware, seeking a declaratory judgment that any payments made to SABIC by the joint venture partnerships were not overcharges that violated any applicable contract. In response, Mobil and Exxon asserted counterclaims in tort 3 and for breach…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. City Investing Co. Liquidating Trust v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  2. Bp Chemicals Ltd. (An English Corporation) v. Formosa Chemical & Fibre Corporation (A Taiwanese Corporation) Joseph Oat Corporation (A Pennsylvania Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  3. Lilly v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  4. Chrysler Corp. v. Chaplake Holdings, Ltd.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  5. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Deuley v. DynCorp International, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  3. Mervyn's LLC v. Lubert-Adler Group IV, LLC (In Re Mervyn's Holdings, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2010
  4. McCorriston v. L.W.T., Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2008
  5. In Re Wal-Mart Wage & Hour Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2007

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API