Legal Opinion
Chrysler Corp. v. Chaplake Holdings, Ltd.
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided May 9, 2003No. 63,2002, 65,2002PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALSH, Justice (Retired).
This is an appeal from a jury award of damages in the Superior Court arising from a failed enterprise for the sale and distribution of Lamborghini automobiles in the United Kingdom. The appellant, defendant-below, contends the Superior Court erred in permitting recovery on the theory of promissory estoppel. The ap-pellee has cross-appealed from rulings disallowing a claim for negligent misrepresentation and refusing an award of prejudgment interest. We find no error in the direct appeal and accordingly affirm the judgment and award of damages. We further conclude that…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Citadel Holding Corp. v. RovenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Lord v. SouderSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Delaware Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. DuphilySupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- Moskowitz v. Mayor & Council of WilmingtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- SIGA Technologies, Inc. v. PharmAthene, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- Saudi Basic Industries Corp. v. Mobil Yanbu Petrochemical Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Territory of the United States Virgin Islands v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2007
- Spencer v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
- Hydrogen Master Rights, Ltd. v. WestonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2017
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.