Legal Opinion

Bland v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 11, 1970PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAREY, Justice.

The defendants below, David Bland and Raymond Medon, were convicted by a jury in Superior Court of burglary and conspiracy to commit burglary. They have appealed, contending that the evidence concerning their alleged participation in the crimes was insufficient to justify their conviction, since it consisted solely of the testimony of alleged accomplices which was so contradictory as to render it unbelievable.

A rather lengthy statement of the evidence is necessary. A family which resides in Wilmington went to the seashore on a Friday afternoon in August, 1968, leaving their…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. HermensIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  3. State v. WaltersSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
  4. The People v. CohenIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  5. O'NEAL v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  2. Hoskins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  3. Brokenbrough v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  4. Keys v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
  5. Cabrera v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API