Legal Opinion

Neal v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided November 8, 2013No. 282, 2013PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELE, Chief Justice:

In this appeal of a denial of a postconviction relief motion, we consider whether trial and appellate counsel were ineffective during their representation of the defendant, stemming from a series of robberies on New Year’s Eve 2008. The defendant argues that his trial and appellate counsel were ineffective for failing to request at trial, and for failing to argue on direct appeal: (1) the inclusion of a Bland instruction in connection with certain accomplice testimony; and (2) the admission of certain out-of-court statements under Delaware Rule of Evidence 804(b)(3). We…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Unitrin, Inc. v. American General Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  2. Baynum v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
  3. Guy v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  4. Purnell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  5. Harden v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API