Legal Opinion

Hoskins v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided September 22, 2014No. 71, 2014PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIDGELY, Justice:

Defendant-Below/Appellant Tremein Hoskins appeals from a Superior Court order denying his Rule 61 Motion for Post-conviction Relief following his conviction of murder second degree. Hoskins raises five arguments on appeal, all related to the performance of his trial counsel. First, Hoskins argues that the Superior Court erred in relying on his counsel’s affidavit in response to Hoskins’ Motion for Post-conviction Relief, creating a structural error that violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Second, Hoskins contends that his counsel was ineffective when he failed to…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Yarborough v. GentrySupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Wainwright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  4. Brittingham v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  5. Dawson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Nationwide Emerging Managers, LLC v. Northpointe Holdings, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  2. Starling v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  3. State v. ReyesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
  4. State v. WrightSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  5. Purnell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API