Legal Opinion

Beck v. City of St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 1975No. 45442, 45465 and 45466PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

These appeals present questions of importance in the law of municipal zoning. The city of St. Paul adopted an ordinance amending its zoning plan. Certain affected citizens challenged the validity of the zoning amendment. The trial court, ruling the new zoning ordinance invalid, enjoined any development of the area in issue that was inconsistent with the former zoning classification.

The property affected by the challenged zoning amendment (hereinafter the “subject area”) is an 8-block area on the southwest edge of the city of St. Paul. The subject area contains approximately…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Kiges v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. State Ex Rel. Howard v. Village of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Sun Oil Company v. Village of New HopeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. O'BRIEN v. City of Saint PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Phelps v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. McShane v. City of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Kroll v. Independent School District No. 593Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API