Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Howard v. Village of Roseville
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 15, 1955No. 36,470PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Justice.
Mandamus to compel respondent, Village of Roseville, to issue to relator, William E. Howard, certain permits for the alteration, construction, and maintenance of a trailer park on his property within the Village of Roseville, Ramsey county. Relator’s property is adjacent to and northwest of the intersection of state highway No. 36 and Victoria street north in the village. It extends approximately 1,280 feet from east to west on highway No. 36 and 165 feet from north to south along Victoria street.
On January 11, 1954, the district court of Ramsey county ordered…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Marcus v. Village of MamaroneckNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Edmonds v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- State Ex Rel. v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Kiges v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Rockville Cars, LLC v. City of RockvilleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Snyder v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of MinnetonkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Pierro v. BaxendaleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.