Legal Opinion

O'BRIEN v. City of Saint Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 26, 1969No. 41458PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

These proceedings seek to enjoin a rezoning of residential property which would permit the construction of apartment buildings without the consent of adjoining owners required by Minn. St. 462.357, subd. 5, and St. Paul Legislative Code, § 64.06.

The only issue is whether the statute and ordinance are constitutional. Defendants Service to Builders, Inc., and Marvin Perlman appeal from a judgment holding these provisions valid and prohibiting the proposed rezoning.

On April 17, 1967, appellant Perlman filed a petition with the city clerk of St. Paul pursuant to St. Paul Legislative…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Cady v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Spector v. Building InspectorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State Theatre Co. v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Beck v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Arno v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. Collis v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API