Presson v. Presson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
Appellant’s assignments of error, challenging the validity of the order appealed from on the ground that the trial court made insufficient findings of fact to support its award of alimony pendente lite and counsel fees and its award of child custody and child support, must be sustained. By statute, G.S. 50-16.8 (f) “[w]hen an application is made for alimony pendente lite, the parties shall be heard orally, upon affidavit, verified pleading, or other proof, and the judge shall find the facts from the evidence so presented.” (Emphasis added.) “While the precise factual findings…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crosby v. CrosbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Austin v. AustinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Swicegood v. SwicegoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Peoples v. PeoplesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- In Re MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
3Cited by5 opinions
- Manning v. ManningCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Sprinkle v. SprinkleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Hogue v. HogueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Hood v. HoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Kornegay v. KornegayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972