Legal Opinion

Manning v. Manning

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 12, 1973No. 733DC703 and 733DC734PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Defendant’s assignments of error challenging the validity of the order on the grounds that the trial court made insufficient findings of fact must be sustained. “ [T]he trial judge must make sufficient findings of the controverted material facts at issue to show that the award of alimony pendente lite is justified and appropriate.” Austin v. Austin, 12 N.C. App. 286, 183 S.E. 2d 420 (1971).

This case is controlled by Presson v. Presson, 13 N.C. App. 81, 185 S.E. 2d 17 (1971), where this Court held that a mere finding that one party is a “dependent spouse” within the meaning of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Crosby v. CrosbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Austin v. AustinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Swicegood v. SwicegoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. In Re MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Ross v. RossCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Page v. MandelCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Alamance County v. N.C. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Gardner v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API