Legal Opinion

Hogue v. Hogue

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 6, 1974No. 7421DC1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendant’s sole assignment of error is to the trial court’s denial and continuance of the motion for alimony and counsel fees pendente lite after having found that the defendant was the dependent spouse and the plaintiff was the supporting spouse. We hold that the motion was properly denied.

G.S. 50-16.3 provides in pertinent part:

“ (a) A dependent spouse who is a party to an action for absolute divorce, divorce from bed and board, annulment, or alimony without divorce, shall be entitled to an order for alimony pendente lite when:(1) It shall appear from all the evidence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rickert v. RickertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Presson v. PressonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ross v. RossCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Painter v. PainterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API