Hood v. Hood
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, Judge.
The husband assigns as error evidence introduced by the wife pertaining to settlement negotiations which had been conducted between the parties without a final agreement being consummated. While the rules of evidence are not as strictly enforced where the judge hears a case without the intervention of a jury, nevertheless, evidence which is obviously incompetent should not be permitted even in such a hearing. 2 Stansbury’s N. C. Evidence, § 180 (Brandis Rev. 1973). In the instant case it was error to permit the wife to testify as to settlement negotiations which had been…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Manning v. ManningCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Morgan v. MorganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Presson v. PressonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rowe v. RoweCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Rowe v. RoweCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981