Legal Opinion

Hood v. Hood

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 4, 1974No. 745DC852PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Judge.

The husband assigns as error evidence introduced by the wife pertaining to settlement negotiations which had been conducted between the parties without a final agreement being consummated. While the rules of evidence are not as strictly enforced where the judge hears a case without the intervention of a jury, nevertheless, evidence which is obviously incompetent should not be permitted even in such a hearing. 2 Stansbury’s N. C. Evidence, § 180 (Brandis Rev. 1973). In the instant case it was error to permit the wife to testify as to settlement negotiations which had been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Manning v. ManningCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Morgan v. MorganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Presson v. PressonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rowe v. RoweCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Rowe v. RoweCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API