In Re Moore
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBritt, J.
Petitioner contends that the trial court erred in signing the order appealed from, arguing that its error was in “failing to act in the best interests” of the minor and in refusing to place the minor with her two sisters in the home of petitioner. We think the trial court erred but for reasons other than those argued.
The following legal principles regarding child custody have been well established in this jurisdiction for many years:
1. The welfare of the child in controversies involving cus tody is the polar star by which the courts must be guided in awarding custody. Chriscoe v. Chriscoe,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crosby v. CrosbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Swicegood v. SwicegoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- In Re the Custody of PittsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Chriscoe v. ChriscoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- In Re the Custody of GriffinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Austin v. AustinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Manning v. ManningCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Powell v. PowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Paschall v. PaschallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Green v. GreenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.