Legal Opinion

Gerlinger Foundry & MacHine Works, Inc. v. Crescent Gold Dredging Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 1951No. Civ. 8039PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.

Plaintiff and respondent brought an action against Crescent Gold Dredging Company, a co-partnership, Roy Mires, Joseph H. Garner, Wallace R. Lynn and J. Stanley Rising to recover the sum of $898.60, setting up six counts in its amended complaint.

In Count 1 it was alleged that defendant Crescent Gold Dredging Company was a copartnership; that the above-named defendants were copartners doing business under that name; that within four years last past said defendants became indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $898.60 upon an open book account for merchandise sold and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Robinson v. American Fish & Oyster Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
  2. Ford v. Lou Kum ShuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  3. Anglo-Californian Bank, Ltd. v. CerfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Gaine v. AustinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. MacDonnell v. California Lands Inc.California Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crabbe v. MiresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Whittaker v. OttoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Clifton Cattle Co. v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Bud Antle, Inc. v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  5. McKee v. MiresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API