Ford v. Lou Kum Shu
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Placer County. J. E. Prewett, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. W. B. Lardner, and Sterling Carr, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an action by the plaintiff to recover from the defendants the sum of $554.19, alleged to be the reasonable value of goods, wares, merchandise, materials, and supplies sold and delivered to the defendants by A. F. Ford & Co., a copartnership.
Prior to the commencement of the action, the complaint alleges, said copartnership sold, assigned, and transferred to the plaintiff all its claim and demand against the defendants on account of the sale and delivery of the goods, wares, etc., referred to.
The complaint does not proceed upon the theory of a copartnership existing between the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lawall v. GromanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Ralphs v. HenslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Bergtholdt v. Porter Bros.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Puget Sound Lumber Co. v. KrugCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Ballard v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Brea v. McGlashanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Brock v. FouchyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Vargas v. RuggieroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Gaine v. AustinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Cordi v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.