Legal Opinion

Anglo-Californian Bank, Ltd. v. Cerf

California Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1905No. L.A. No. 1323PublishedCited by 19 opinions

APPEAL from on order of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County denying a new trial. E. P. Unangst, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is another appeal in the action involved in Anglo-Californian Bank v. Cerf (L. A. No. 1276), ante, p. 384, this day decided. The appeal here is by defendants Ernest Cerf and L. M. Kaiser, who joined with defendant Moses Cerf in the execution of the deeds held to be mortgages, and is from an order denying their motion for a new trial. By their answer they expressly admitted that they executed and delivered the same for the purpose of securing to plaintiff the payment of a certain indebtedness of the firm of “Blochman & Cerf” to plaintiff,—viz., an indebtedness of $34,300, existing on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sather Banking Co. v. Arthur R. Briggs Co.California Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States Leasing Corp. v. duPontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Brea v. McGlashanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. DeMartini v. Alexander Sanitarium, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Fleming v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Eade v. ReichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API