Legal Opinion
Daviau v. Planning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 7, 1978PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLongo, J.
The defendant planning commission is appealing from a judgment sustaining the plaintiffs’ appeal from the denial by the defendant of the plaintiffs’ application for a proposed subdivision in Putnam called “Meadow Acres.” The plaintiffs Albert Gr. Daviau and Lorraine Daviau own the property to be subdivided. The plaintiff Raymond Daddario holds an option to purchase the property.
The finding 1 discloses that on December 13, 1973, the plaintiffs filed an application with the defendant for permission to subdivide their property into fifty-two lots for the construction of single-family homes…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Couch v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Corsino v. GroverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Forest Construction Co. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Pecora v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Senior v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Central Bank for Savings v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Massimo v. Planning CommissionConnecticut Superior Court · 1989
- Bell v. Planning Z. Comm. of Bridgeport, No. Cv95 32 23 96 (Mar. 7, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.