Legal Opinion

Bell v. Planning Z. Comm. of Bridgeport, No. Cv95 32 23 96 (Mar. 7, 1997)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided March 7, 1997No. CV95 32 23 96 CT Page 2819Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

The named plaintiff, Calvin Bell and other residents1 bring this appeal pursuant to General Statutes § 8-8 to contest a decision of the defendant, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Bridgeport ["the Commission"]. In this decision, the Commission granted the defendant 2500 SS Limited Partnership's ["the Partnership"] application to rezone an area from a Residence A Zone to a Design Business District #1 Zone. The plaintiffs also contest the Commission's decision…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Bloom v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Jolly, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  4. Burnham v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. West Hartford Interfaith Coalition, Inc. v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API