Legal Opinion

Hood v. Diamond Products, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1996No. 94-1217PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The primary issue before this court is whether the court of appeals properly concluded that summary judgment in favor of appellees was appropriate. For the reasons that follow, we answer this question in the negative and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Handicap discrimination in employment situations is prohibited by R.C. 4112.02(A).1 This statutory2 provision provides that:

“It shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice:
*302“(A) For any employer, because of the race, color, religion, sex, national origin, handicap, age, or ancestry of any person, to discharge without…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Plumbers & Steamfitters Joint Apprenticeship Committee v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Davis v. Loopco Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Hazlett v. Martin Chevrolet, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Wysong v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Mitnaul v. Fairmount Presbyterian ChurchOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Shaver v. Wolske & BlueOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Ekstrom v. Cuyahoga County Community CollegeOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Brown v. BKW Drywall Supply, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API