Legal Opinion

Barrilo v. Frank

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1934No. Appeals 536 and 537PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Pabkeb, J.,

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, have judgments against J. Frank & Sons, Inc., in an action in trespass. The defendant has appealed, complaining of the refusal of its motions for judgment n. o. v. and for a new trial.

Appellant, in support of its motion for judgment n. o. v., alleges that it was not properly made a party to this action. In the original statement of claim, J. Frank & Sons, a partnership, was named as the defendant. After the partnership had filed an affidavit of defense, the plaintiff moved to amend the statement of claim and the title of the case by naming J.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wright v. Eureka Tempered Copper Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. McGinnis v. Valvoline Oil Works, Ltd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Bergman v. StrausSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  4. Dress v. Schuylkill Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Radel v. SeibSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Taylor v. KaufholdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Miners Savings Bank v. NaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Wagner v. New York, Ontario and Western RailwayDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Stern v. DekelbaumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API