Wright v. Eureka Tempered Copper Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 262, Jan. T., 1902, by-plaintiff, from order of C. P. Erie Co., Nov. T., 1901, No. 56, discharging rule to amend record in case of Charles S. Wright v. Eureka Tempered Copper Company. Rule to amend record. Before Walling, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case. Errors assigned were in discharging rules to amend the record and return.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice ITelu,
The Eureka Tempered Copper Company is a corporation that was engaged for a number of years in business in North East, Erie County. Its property was sold by the sheriff in 1896, and since then it has not done any business, but still exists as a corporation. In December, 1896, the Eureka Tempered Copper Works was chartered, and this corporation succeeded to the business of the copper company. In 1899, the plaintiff while in the employ of the copper works was injured, and in 1901, three days before his right of action was barred by the statute of limitations, he…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grier v. Northern Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Peterson ex rel. Peterson v. Delaware River Ferry Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Garman v. GlassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Trego v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
3Cited by71 opinions
- Saracina v. CotoiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Taylor v. KaufholdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Girardi v. Laquin Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Newman v. FreemanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- Waugh v. Steelton Taxicab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.